What do Scientists say...?

First, let's get this clear: There are Scientists out there saying that creationism has as good a chance of being correct as evolution does. You may have even met some of these Scientists at church. My point being that just because a person says he or she is a Scientist doesn't mean that there are truths he or she wouldn't ignore in favor of a upholding a belief system. If you can't admit that there are biased Scientists, it's silly for you to continue reading this.

No serious thinker can believe that the investigation of global weather is a waste of time. The more we know about the future of the earth's weather and weather patterns, the better. Even if all you want to know is when and where you can plan on playing golf, or going skiing. Which is why there is intense investigation into what the future holds for us, weather-wise. Some by people who want to prove a belief system, and some by people who are open-minded and genuinely curious.

But when you are talking about the future, and what it holds, the conclusions reached, no matter how you arrive at them, are predictions. Think about predictions; even the ones you have some control over aren't guaranteed to come true. The easiest thing in the world is to find predictions that never came true.

Now some people might argue that there are some predictions so dire, that even if they won't come true, we're better off preparing for them, in case they do. How can anyone argue with that premise? You can't. You just have to ignore people who talk like that.

Is there a case for ignoring people hollering about the disaster du jour? Depends. If the disaster is human-oriented, like the Jews in Germany in the mid-1930, obviously they should have gotten the hell out when they were warned. But they ignored the small minority who predicted what Hitler had in mind. With regard to ignoring impending natural disasters, it's been humanity's penchant to ignore them, even when some of the proof was staring them in the face. Both for the same reason, which I'll get to...

"Global Warming" is said to be of human origin. Making Humanity the equivalent of the Jews in Germany in the early 1930s. At least those who believe in "Global Warming" are, in effect, saying this. Take action now, they say, or stay and die. Al Gore says this. So let's call this phenomenon 'AlGoreism.' We can call the opposite point of view 'BertBananaism.'

To answer those who will ask, "Bert Bananas, you monster! How can you so blithely gamble with humanity's future by ignoring the people who only want to save your life, and the lives of your many, many, many offspring?"

Here is my answer: You are so full of yourself! 98.3% of humanity does not think about the future and they aren't impressed with people who do! Today is when they are alive and they want to be as comfortable as they possibly can. This is why so many Jews stayed! They refused to be inconvenienced and so they rationalized and made excuses until it was too late. And that's what 98.3% of humanity is doing now. Why do you think this BS of Carbon Offsets is so popular among the rich carbon dioxide producers? They don't want to stop producing carbon dioxide! And think about China, South-East Asia, India, Africa and the Americas south of the Rio Grande? Heck, you can throw 98.3% of the United States and Europe into this mix! 98.3% of us are not losing one bit of sleep over "Global Warming." Meaning that we are not going to change. And the Chicken Littles in the 1.7% group trying to force the changes on us, they'll be removed from whatever power positions they're occupying if they get close to inconveniencing the rest of us.

And that's the way it should be. Because either we, Humanity, adapt to whatever changes come, or we don't. We need to continue reinventing ourselves. And if we don't...

Did you know that genetic studies indicate the possibility that at one point in our evolutionary history the human population was reduced to just a few tens of thousand people? No one is hazarding any guesses why, it is simply being proposed that there are largely indisputable genetic indications of this being the case. I'm saying that whatever calamity Humanity survived then was probably a lot more sudden and rigorous than what we are allegedly facing now.

"Global Warming" is not Hitler. Hysteria aside, there is no need to move/change. At the very worst, we will be forced to find a way to quickly remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Piece of cake. So you 1.7%, stop stressing.